Writing a Great Essay for LNAT Section B

Section B of the Law National Aptitude Test (LNAT), is the essay which helps UK universities like Oxford, UCL, and Durham etc. assess your ability to argue persuasively and write clearly. Unlike the multiple-choice Section A, which tests your logical reasoning, the essay evaluates your ability to structure an argument, consider different perspectives, and communicate your ideas effectively. Here is how to write a great LNAT essay.

Length, Time and Scoring

The essay must be less than 750 words, but the best essays are usually around 600 words. You have 40 minutes to write, so managing your time is essential. Unlike section A of the LNAT, the essay is not scored numerically. It is assessed qualitatively by universities for clarity, logic, structure, and persuasiveness. Weight varies e.g., Oxford uses it heavily with Section A and interviews.

Possible Essay Topics

LNAT essay questions cover a wide range of topics, including social, political, ethical, and legal issues. They are designed to test your critical thinking skills and how well you can argue a point. Here are some examples of past questions:

• What disciplinary sanctions should teachers be allowed to use?

• Should the government fund the arts?

• How should judges be appointed?

• Should students help pay for their university education?

• Does it matter if some species become extinct?

• What is ‘political correctness’ and why does it matter?

• Should voting in general elections be mandatory?

• Should we sacrifice traditional freedoms to fight terrorism?

• Should private cars be rationed?

To prepare, read widely on current affairs, ethics, law, and politics. Reliable sources like The Guardian, The Times, The Economist, and BBC News will help you understand different viewpoints and develop well-rounded arguments.

Structuring Your LNAT Essay

A strong LNAT essay is concise, logically organized, and balanced, demonstrating your ability to argue a point while acknowledging counter arguments. Here is a proven structure and strategy to ace your essays. Think of the essay as having five distinct sections. 

1. Introduction

2. Background and Context

3. Main Arguments

4. Counter Arguments

5. Conclusion

   
   

We have provided below sample essays broken down as per this structure. 

Example 1: What Disciplinary Sanctions Should Teachers Be Allowed to Use

Example 2: Should voting in general elections be mandatory

1. Introduction: Your introduction should provide a brief overview of the topic and present your stance. Introduce the issue clearly and outline the main arguments. Keep it concise.

Example 1: “Disciplinary sanctions in schools play a crucial role in maintaining order, ensuring effective learning, and fostering personal responsibility among students. However, the extent of authority teachers should have in enforcing disciplinary measures remains a subject of debate. While some argue for strict punitive measures to ensure compliance, others believe that excessive punishments can be detrimental to students’ development. Discipline must be proportionate, effective, and respectful of students’ rights. The question of what disciplinary sanctions teachers should be allowed to use requires careful consideration of various factors, including the nature and severity of the infraction, the student’s disciplinary history, and the effectiveness of different sanctions.”

Example 2: “Voting in general elections is a fundamental right and responsibility in a democracy. It allows citizens to influence political decisions and hold governments accountable. However, whether voting should be compulsory is widely debated. Some argue that mandatory voting would enhance democratic participation and legitimacy, while others believe it infringes on personal freedom and could lead to uninformed choices.”

The above introductions are clear, explain the topic, and set up the essay’s direction.

2. Background and Context: Before presenting your main arguments, provide context. Explain the significance of the issue and any relevant historical, legal, or societal factors. Your knowledge and awareness of the topic will come out in this section and set the stage for the main argument and your counter-arguments.

Example 1: "Discipline in schools serves multiple purposes: it deters misbehavior, reinforces societal values, and ensures a safe learning environment. Traditional disciplinary measures include verbal reprimands, detention, parental involvement, and, in extreme cases, suspension or expulsion. However, not all infractions warrant severe consequences. The application of disciplinary sanctions should be guided by factors such as the severity of the behavior, whether it is a repeated offense, the age of the student, and its impact on peers. A structured and reasonable approach to discipline ensures fairness and maximizes its educational value.”

Example 2: “In democracies, elections are crucial for selecting representatives and shaping policies. High voter turnout is often seen as a sign of a healthy democracy. However, voter participation can be low due to apathy or disillusionment. Supporters of compulsory voting argue that it can address these issues by ensuring everyone engages in the electoral process. Opponents, however, believe that mandatory voting infringes on personal liberty, as individuals should have the right to decide whether to participate.”

This background helps the reader understand the issue's importance without unnecessary detail.

3. Main Arguments: The body of your essay should present your main arguments, typically 2-3 key points supporting your stance. Each argument should be clearly introduced in a topic sentence, followed by explanation and evidence.

Example 1: “Teachers should have the authority to use a range of disciplinary actions tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. For minor infractions—such as talking in class or failing to complete homework—a scolding or a warning is usually sufficient. These measures serve as immediate corrective actions that deter further misconduct without unnecessary escalation.

For repeated misbehavior or moderate infractions, sanctions such as detention, requiring the student to stand outside the classroom, or issuing a note to parents may be appropriate. These measures reinforce accountability while giving students an opportunity to reflect on their actions. Detention, in particular, is effective as it provides a consequence without significantly disrupting the student’s education.

For serious infractions—such as bullying, vandalism, or severe disruptions—more severe disciplinary actions are necessary. Calling parents to school is an important step in addressing persistent misbehavior, as it ensures collaboration between educators and families. In extreme cases, suspension or expulsion may be justified, particularly if a student’s actions pose a threat to others or persistently undermine school discipline. Expulsion should be reserved for the most egregious offenses, such as violent behavior or repeated violations despite multiple interventions.”

Example 2: “One of the strongest arguments for mandatory voting is that it enhances the legitimacy of elected governments. When more citizens vote, election results better reflect the will of the population. This leads to a government that represents a wider range of interests, not just those of a politically active minority. Mandatory voting ensures that all voices are heard.

Low voter turnout often allows the most engaged, and sometimes extreme, sections of the electorate to have disproportionate influence. Mandatory voting would ensure broader participation, potentially reducing the impact of extreme political views and promoting a more balanced government.

Mandatory voting can also encourage people to become more politically informed. When voting is compulsory, individuals are more likely to educate themselves on key issues and candidates, leading to a more informed electorate. This strengthens democracy.

Finally, compulsory voting promotes a sense of civic duty. In many democracies, citizens are required to fulfill responsibilities such as paying taxes or serving on juries. Similarly, mandatory voting reinforces the idea that participation in the democratic process is not merely a personal choice but a shared obligation.”

Here, the argument is clear, and reasoning is provided to support it.

4. Counter-arguments: A strong essay acknowledges opposing views by presenting at least one counterargument and explaining why it is weak or less convincing. This demonstrates critical thinking and the ability to analyze issues from multiple angles.

Example 1: “Some argue that harsh disciplinary measures, such as standing outside the classroom or expulsion, may be counterproductive, leading to resentment or alienation. While this is a valid concern, the solution lies not in abolishing such measures but in ensuring they are applied judiciously. A fair disciplinary system considers the age and background of the student, the intent behind the action, and whether the punishment aligns with the infraction’s severity. Additionally, restorative approaches, such as conflict resolution and counseling, should complement disciplinary measures to ensure long-term behavioral improvement rather than mere punishment.”

Example 2: “Opponents, however, argue that mandatory voting infringes on individual freedom. In a democratic society, citizens should have the right to choose whether or not to vote. Abstention can be a form of political expression, particularly for those disillusioned with the candidates or the political system. Forcing people to vote undermines their right to make that choice. In India, voters who are uncertain about whom to support have the option to select the "None of the Above" (NOTA) button. This feature allows individuals to participate in the electoral process while expressing their dissatisfaction with the available candidates. This is a completely valid way for citizens to register their discontent without abstaining from voting. However, critics argue that even with the NOTA option, mandatory voting could encourage random or uninformed voting, ultimately lowering the quality of electoral outcomes. Enforcing mandatory voting would require penalties such as fines for non-compliance. This could create a financial burden for some individuals, particularly those from disadvantaged backgrounds. Moreover, enforcing penalties may seem undemocratic, as it prioritizes participation over personal choice. Additionally, compulsory voting could lead to resentment and disengagement, eroding trust in the political system.

In this section you should also include any rebuttals of the counter arguments to strengthen your position, showing a balanced yet persuasive approach.

5. Conclusion: Your conclusion should summarize the key points and restate your position clearly without introducing new ideas. This is your opportunity to wrap up your argument effectively.

Example 1: “Discipline is essential for an effective learning environment, but it must be applied thoughtfully. Teachers should have the authority to use a range of disciplinary sanctions, from warnings to expulsions, depending on the severity and frequency of misconduct. By considering factors such as the type of infraction, the student’s history, and the impact of their actions, schools can ensure that discipline remains fair, effective, and conducive to a positive educational experience.”

Example 2: “In the end, mandatory voting is not only about compelling participation—it's about ensuring that democracy remains truly representative of all its citizens. While personal freedom is undeniably important, the right to vote carries with it a responsibility to shape the future of our societies. By making voting compulsory, we create a more inclusive democracy where every voice is heard, not just those of the politically active or the vocal minority. It fosters a sense of shared duty, encourages political engagement, and strengthens the very foundations of democratic legitimacy. The essence of democracy lies in the participation of its people, and mandatory voting is a step towards ensuring that every citizen plays their part in determining the direction of their nation.”

A strong conclusion reinforces your stance, ensuring your argument remains clear and impactful.

The LNAT essay is your chance to show your ability to think critically and argue persuasively. To do well, practice writing essays on different topics, read widely, and refine your ability to present balanced and logical arguments. With good preparation and a clear structure, you can write a strong essay that makes a lasting impression.

EZ Scholar is a premium admissions consultancy and test prep organization which works with bright and ambitious students seeking admissions to Ivy Leagues, Oxbridge, and other top global universities. Our experts have mentored thousands of students with their profile building, research papers, extracurricular and co-curricular activities, test prep, and admissions essays.